[Tweeters] short cut names
wallydavis3 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 5 16:44:14 PST 2017
Thank you Jane,
I was just about to post a note asking people to consider not TLAs and FLAs (3 and 4 letter acronyms) to identify birds. Most of the time I have no idea what bird is being identified unless the bird’s name is spelled out somewhere. For what it’s worth, I’m not a novice; I’m a retired biologist who used to lead birding trips.
From: tweeters-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu [mailto:tweeters-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Jane Stewart
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2017 1:26 PM
Subject: [Tweeters] short cut names
Brief names (acronyms) are OK when the audience knows the birds.
In general they are difficult; and discourage new birders.
We want to encourage new birders; so, I say restrain.
We are not an exclusive fraternity.
121 Solar Lane
Sequim, WA 98382-8324
jstewart at olympus.net
From: tweeters-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu [mailto:tweeters-bounces at mailman1.u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Bud Anderson
Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2017 12:54 PM
To: tweeters <tweeters at u.washington.edu>
Subject: [Tweeters] Rude comment from sort of a curmudgeon
A Roughie is actually a fish.
A Rough-legged Hawk is a raptor.
Please help save us from other such "cute" atrocities like "Kessy", "P-bird", and, of course, "Baldy".
And, no, I don't know why "Sharpie" is OK. It just is.
And "Coopie" and "Gossy" just aren't.
OK, I feel better now.
More information about the Tweeters