[Tweeters] Some binocular recommendations?

Devon Comstock devonc78 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 7 14:38:06 PST 2017


For a good mid-range price bino I always recommend the Eagle Optics
Platinum Rangers. Lifetime warranty, hardy binocular, waterproof, lifetime
maintenance for little cost. I'm partial to the 10 x 42s myself, but you
will get a lot of birders to tell you to go for 8 x 42 for more image
stability and close range viewing.

For a high end bino you can't go wrong with Swarovskis, though after a lot
of research I ended up buying a pair of Zeiss Victory SF. They are both a
hefty price at about $2,000 plus. I joke that with my old rangers it was
looking at birds through a dirty shower curtain compared to the crispness
of my Zeiss.

Audubon recently did an article about choosing binoculars


Devon Comstock

On Mar 7, 2017 11:39 AM, "Dusty Bleher" <TweeterReader at bagithere.com> wrote:

> G'day all! Along with my search for a new camera (Nikon P900 so far), I

> just decided to upgrade my binoculars as well. I've had these since my

> kids were little, so I've not kept up on the trends in viewing these last

> 30-40 years. Anybody got any recommendations? Things to look for? Things

> to avoid? My current ones are a Swift model 828, 10X42. One of the

> reasons I got them was they were waterproof (always good with me holding

> them 😊!), and very close focus. I'm sure the technology has changed over

> the years, so any recommendations would be MOST appreciated.


> TIA,

> Dusty

> Currently parked off of a dirt road, on a hill, in the forest north of

> Lake Stevens.



> _______________________________________________

> Tweeters mailing list

> Tweeters at u.washington.edu

> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20170307/436a557e/attachment.html>

More information about the Tweeters mailing list