[Tweeters] Slightly off topic, but relevant: Editorial in today's Olympian regarding WDFW ExecutiveDirector position

Hal Michael ucd880 at comcast.net
Sun Dec 7 12:23:18 PST 2014


Perhaps. But acting through the legislature, they are the ones willing to pay for it.
 
It also seems that non-consumptive use is as much of a special interest group as consumptive.



Hal Michael
Olympia WA
360-459-4005 (H)
360-791-7702 (C)
ucd880 at comcast.net

----- Original Message -----

The primary mandate for WDFW under RCW 77.04.012 is to protect, preserve, and perpetuate our state’s wildlife.  It therefore seems rather unethical for WDFW to allow special interest groups to decide the fate of our state’s wildlife, just because they contribute the most to the WDFW budget.  They are in essence putting the fate of our state’s wildlife up for the highest bid.
 
Diane Weinstein
Issaquah

_______________________________________________
Tweeters mailing list
Tweeters at u.washington.edu
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters



More information about the Tweeters mailing list