[pccgrads] "A Vast Machine", part II: Wednesday May 3

Naomi Goldenson ngoldens at uw.edu
Thu Apr 13 11:15:59 PDT 2017

We will continue our discussion of "A Vast Machine" on *May 3rd at 1:30pm*.
To focus the discussion a bit more, let's all skip to Chapter 13 - the end
(~the last 100 pages). This is the part on climate data and what it can say
about the future, just to entice you.

Back in the fall, our discussion focused on the first 5 chapters, which are
mostly history. If you're just joining now, you might enjoy Chapter 1 which
frames a lot of what follows. Then you'd skip/skim the intervening chapters
on history of atmospheric observations and models, followed by some that
discuss data issues with global datasets.

Location: TBD. Perhaps out back at Solstice if it's nice out. Perhaps in
ATG, where I've reserved a room in case.


*Description: "A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the
Politics of Global Warming"

*Global warming skeptics often fall back on the argument that the
scientific case for global warming is all model predictions, nothing but
simulation; they warn us that we need to wait for real data, "sound
science." In A VastMachine Paul Edwards has news for these skeptics:
without models, there are no data. Today, no collection of signals or
observations -- even from satellites, which can "see" the whole planet with
a single instrument -- becomes global in time and space without passing
through a series of data models. Everything we know about the world's
climate we know through models. Edwards offers an engaging and innovative
history of how scientists learned to understand the atmosphere -- to
measure it, trace its past, and model its future.*

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Naomi Goldenson <ngoldens at uw.edu> wrote:

> Hi folks,


> I know that a bunch of you were waiting anxiously to hear when we would

> finish discussing "A Vast Machine", and now, just when you'd given up, I'm

> here to see if anyone would still like to do this?


> So, to gauge interest, please fill out this poll as though it represents a

> generic week this quarter, and then we'll try to pick a time if there's

> interest.

> http://whenisgood.net/ygz8hdr


> After this we could do another book, so think on that too.


> Thanks!

> Naomi


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/pipermail/pccgrads/attachments/20170413/ba93e676/attachment.html>

More information about the pccgrads mailing list